Legal Opinion

Losco v. Heckler

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 12, 1985No. 84 Civ. 3971 (RJW)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.

This is an action brought pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act as amended (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to review a final determination of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the “Secretary”). That decision denied plaintiff’s application for federal disability insurance benefits. Plaintiff moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R. Civ.P. 1 The Secretary cross-moves for judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to Rule 12(c), Fed.R.Civ.P. For the reasons hereinafter stated, plaintiffs motion is granted insofar as it seeks…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rivera v. SullivanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  2. Frank v. ChaterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  3. Losco v. BowenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  4. Jozefick v. ShalalaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Cameron v. BowenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API