Wakefield v. State
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Bexar. Tried below before the Hon. J. A. Ware.
1Opinion of the Court
Reeves, Associate Justice.
One of the grounds of the motion for a new trial in this case is that a member of the *557jury separated from his fellows during their deliberations, unaccompanied by an officer. The code provides that “ after a jury has been sworn and impaneled to try any case of felony, they shall not be permitted to separate until they have returned a verdict, unless by permission of the court, with the consent of the District Attorney and the defendant, and in charge of an officer.” (Art. 3070.) It is not pretended that the juror conversed with any person in regard to the case, or…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jack v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by20 opinions
- Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Littles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Hall v. Philadelphia Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Eichholz v. ShaftSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.