Legal Opinion
Rastetter v. Weinberger
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided July 24, 1974No. CIV 72-323 PHXÂCAMPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
Before KILKENNY, Circuit Judge, and EAST and MUECKE, District Judges. MUECKE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are a group of Medicare recipients in Arizona who are seeking to declare the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1395x(r) unconstitutional on the grounds that it excludes chiropractors and naturopaths from its definition of “physician.”
The plaintiffs are also attempting to overturn the provisions of Part B of Title XVIII (Public Law 89-97, 79 Stat. 286) which provides up to eighty percent reimbursement for the reasonable costs of medical treatment performed by a licensed medical…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Humana of South Carolina, Inc. v. CalifanoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Dr. Joseph G. Bussey, Jr., M. D. And Amy Jackson, P. A. v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Della WHITE, Roy S. White, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Dr. Emanuel Pushkin v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Madison v. Mississippi Medicaid CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.