Howell Ex Rel. Parker v. Utility Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.
The defendant’s chief assignment of error, or the one most strongly urged on the argument and in its brief, is based on the exception addressed to the refusal of the court to grant its motion for judgment as of nonsuit, made at the close of plaintiff’s evidence. The defendant offered no testimony.
Viewing the evidence in its most favorable light for the plaintiff, the accepted position on a motion of this kind, the following facts maybe taken as established, or as reasonable inferences to be drawn from the testimony of the several witnesses:
The plaintiff, a young man about 18 years of age at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pressly v. Yarn Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Holton v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Thompson v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Beck v. Sylva Tanning Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Howard v. Buckeye Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Maulden v. High Point Chair Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Riggs Ex Rel. Riggs v. Empire Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Street v. Erskine-Ramsey Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Smith v. RitchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Street v. . Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.