Legal Opinion

Crouch v. Moll

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from special term, Monroe county. Action by George W. Grouch, Jr., against Leo Moll, to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMacomber, J.

This action was brought to foreclose a lien of the plaintiff, as the material-man who had furnished lumber and shingles to the defendant *184for the construction of a house between May 27, 1884, and July 24, 1884. Within 30 days after the completion of the building erected upon defendant’s premises, a notice of lien in behalf of the plaintiff was duly tiled in the proper clerk’s office for the amount of such lumber and materials so furnished by the plaintiff.

It is urged upon our attention by the learned counsel for the appellant that the agreement by which the plaintiff furnished the materials…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hugg v. ShankNew York Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mowbray v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. Nussberger v. WassermanNew York Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API