Legal Opinion
State v. Trochez-Jimenez
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 8, 2014No. 88577-0Published
1Opinion of the Court
FILE· IN CLERKS OFFICE 8JPREME COU'fl f!A'!'e OF W1'1111Nf'8llllllftllllaMOII DATE MAY 0 8 2014 Thisopi"nlOn.wasflled forrecord R. ?.Qr~.-1 -YJ4~9 at '6:oq q.-r> on Ma"f \~~~MSupreme Court Clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, NO. 88577-0 v. ENBANC CESAR E. TROCHEZ-JIMENEZ, Petitioner. Filed MAY 0 8 2014 STEPHENS, I.-Petitioner Cesar Trochez-Jimenez appeals his conviction for murder in the second degree, arguing the statements he made during custodial interrogation should have been suppressed because they were taken in violation of Miranda v.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Arizona v. RobersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.