Legal Opinion
United Construction Workers v. H. O. Canfield Co.
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided September 6, 1955No. File 81528PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
• Troland, J.
On or about August 6, 1947, a labor dispute within the meaning of §§ 1420e-1424e of the 1939 Cumulative Supplement to the General Statutes (Rev. 1949, §§ 7408-7412) existed between the plaintiff union and its members and the defendant H. 0. Canfield Company, at its factory in Bridgeport. On August 6, 1947, upon the application of Canfield Company, Honorable J. Howard Roberts, a judge of the Superior Court, made the necessary preliminary finding and ordered “that upon the filing of a satisfactory undertaking in the sum of Ten Thousand ($10,000.) Dollars to answer all damages in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McNish v. American Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Proto v. Bridgeport Herald CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- City of Yonkers v. Federal Sugar Refining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Cole v. Associated Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Donnelly Garment Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wyoming Bancorporation v. BonhamWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Connecticut State Employees Ass'n v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal EmployeesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Tracy v. CapozziNevada Supreme Court · 1982
- Venegas v. United Farm Workers UnionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- McAtee v. Faulkner Land & Livestock, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.