Legal Opinion

Venegas v. United Farm Workers Union

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 21, 1976No. 1341-3PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcInturff, C.J.

Seven named plaintiffs, all tenants of a migrant labor camp, appeal from a judgment dismissing their complaint for an injunction against invasion of the privacy of their homes by the United Farm .Workers (UFW), a labor union. Though originally brought as a class action, the tenants are proceeding here in their individual capacities. On cross-appeal, the UFW seeks review of denial of its motion for joinder of additional parties and an inadequate award of attorney fees. We affirm.

The UFW is the duly elected collective bargaining agent of those agricultural laborers residing at the Yakima Chief…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. Golden Age Brewing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. City of Yonkers v. Federal Sugar Refining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Holmes Harbor Water Co. v. PageCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  4. Lewis v. Physicians & Dentists Credit Bureau, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Cecil v. DominyWashington Supreme Court · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. System Concepts, Inc. v. DixonUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Wyoming Bancorporation v. BonhamWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Seattle Fire Fighters Union, Local No. 27 v. HollisterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  4. Jensen v. TorrCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  5. Tracy v. CapozziNevada Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API