Roberts v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
The complaint in this action, and this appeal growing out of the circuit court’s order denying the prisoner’s application for post-conviction relief, is another among the multitude of actions brought and appealed without any justification whatsoever. Such actions are inspired by the rulings *342of the Supreme Court of the United States interpreting the federal Constitution.
That Court has held that if a wealthy person may process an appeal, it is the duty of the state to provide an indigent person with the same right at the taxpayers’ expense.1 A free lawyer and a free transcript of record is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Dykes v. Superior Electrical ContractorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986