Legal Opinion
Clayworth v. Bonta
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 23, 2003No. CIV-S-03-2110 DFL/PA, CIV-S-03-2336 DFL/PAPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
LEVI, District Judge.
Medi-Cal providers and beneficiaries challenge the State of California’s impending 5% reduction in the reimbursement rate paid to providers. Plaintiffs contend that the rate reduction violates the Medicaid statute, particularly the quality of care and equal access provisions, and they seek a preliminary injunction preventing defendant Diana Bonta, the Director of the California Department of Health Services, from implementing the rate reduction when it is scheduled- to go into effect on January 1; 2004.
The case presents two sorts of issues.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. v. Maxwell-JollyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Equal Access for El Paso, Inc. v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Clark v. RichmanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- California Ass'n for Health Service at Home v. State Department of Health ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Arizona Ass'n of Providers for Persons with Disabilities v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.