Legal Opinion
Lemmons v. Newton
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 4, 2004No. A04A1993PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburn, Presiding Judge.
Following the dismissal of his case, Perry O. Lemmons, acting pro se, appeals, maintaining that the trial court erred in finding that his delay in filing a transcript on appeal was unreasonable and inexcusable. Finding no error, we affirm.
“In reviewing a finding of unreasonable and inexcusable delay in filing a transcript, this court will not disturb the lower court’s finding absent an abuse of discretion.” Dept. of Human Resources v. Patillo.
[Lemmons’s] obligation to file the transcript is governed in part by OCGA § 5-6-42, which requires an appellant who wants to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Department of Human Resources v. PattiloCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Hall v. BusseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- In re G. W. H.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Glen Restaurants, Inc. v. Building 5 Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
3Cited by8 opinions
- Winzer v. EHCA DUNWOODY, LLC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Grant v. KOOBYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- In the Interest of T. H.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- CALLAWAY Et Al. v. GARNER Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- Mitchell v. 3280 PEACHTREE 1, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.