Legal Opinion
Doyle v. Loring
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 10, 1939No. 8239PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, Circuit Judge.
The District Court dismissed the bill filed March 29, 1938, for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, and for lack of proper venue.
The plaintiffs were, Lourena Loring Marshall, a citizen and resident of Washington County, Tennessee; Mabel Loring Doyle, a citizen and resident of California; and Helen Doyle Knox, Benjamin Doyle and Marshall Doyle, citizens and residents of Arizona. They sue as heirs and distributees of B. F. Loring, who died in Dan-ville, Illinois, October 30, 1937.
The defendants were, Mrs. B. F. Loring, the widow of B. F. Loring, sued individually…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Seaboard Rice Milling Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Memphis St. Ry. Co. v. BoboCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- Interstate Refineries, Inc. v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Toledo, St. L. & W. R. v. PerenchioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gibson v. Miami Valley Milk Producers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Rensing v. Turner Aviation CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1958
- Rosen v. Savant Instruments, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1967
- Drozda v. McComasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Parker v. McGahaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.