Commonwealth v. Nestor

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Two separate indictments charging sodomy, were consolidated for trial and the defendant was convicted on both of them. These appeals are from the judgments of sentence imposed. The defendant contends that there is error in the refusal of new trials. The cases were well tried and there was not even a general exception to the court’s charge. The motions for new trials contain the usual stereotyped general averments and nothing more. Under the Buies of Court of Dauphin County, as well as by the general law, defendant was obliged to be specific in the assignments of errors of…