Legal Opinion
Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC v. M/V VEGALAND
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided May 13, 2014No. Civil Action No. H-13-66Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
GRAY H. MILLER, District Judge.
Pending before the court are Nordana Line A/S’s (“Nordana”) motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. 14) and plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. 27). After considering the parties’ briefing, record evidence, and applicable law, the court is of the opinion that Norda-na’s motion for partial summary judgment should be GRANTED and plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment should be DENIED.
I. Background
This maritime case stems from damaged cargo being transported by sea from Genoa, Italy to Houston, Texas. Dkt. 1, p.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adam G. Nunez v. The Superior Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Pamela Richardson v. Monitronics International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Brown & Root, Inc. v. M/v Peisander, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.