Legal Opinion
Irby v. All State Industries
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided November 14, 1969No. 1354PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
SWINFORD, Chief Judge.
Defendant, Quaker City Industries, Inc., is a New York corporation with its principal place of business and offices at Karlstadt and Patterson, New Jersey. Quaker City manufactures swimming pools and pre-fabricated storage buildings at its New Jersey locations. The sole distributor of Quaker City’s swimming pools is M & S Distributors of Linden, New Jersey. Defendant Quaker *773City states that M & S Distributors an independent organization under no control of Quaker City. No contrary allegation is in the record. is
In the case at bar it appears that Quaker City…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Dealers Transport Co. v. Battery Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Davis H. Elliot Co. Inc. v. Caribbean Utilities Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Bennet v. Cincinnati Checker Cab Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1973