Legal Opinion

Stoebner v. S. DAK. FARM BUREAU MUT. INS.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1999No. NonePublished

1Opinion of the Court

598 N.W.2d 557 (1999)

1999 SD 106

Jeanette STOEBNER, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

SOUTH DAKOTA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 20577.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Argued March 22, 1999.

Decided August 11, 1999.

Timothy L. James of James & Associates, P.C., Yankton, South Dakota, Attorneys for plaintiff and appellee.

Mark D. O'Leary, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Attorney for defendant and appellant.

SABERS, Justice

[¶ 1.] Farm Bureau appeals a summary judgment that it breached a duty to defend. Finding genuine issues of material fact, we reverse and remand for trial.

FACTS

[¶…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Messersmith v. . American Fidelity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Grange Insurance Co. v. BrosseauWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Allstate Insurance v. NovakNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Preferred Mutual Insurance v. ThompsonOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Lamp v. First National Bank of GarretsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API