Legal Opinion

Jewell v. Barnes' Admr.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 19, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Case 44 — Action by Robert M. Jewell Against the Louisville Trust Co., Administrator of C. P. Barnes, etc., to Enforce an Alleged Trust — APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT, CHANCERY DIVISION. Judgment for Defendants and Plaintiff Appeals.

Read the full summary

Case 44 — Action by Robert M. Jewell Against the Louisville Trust Co., Administrator of C. P. Barnes, etc., to Enforce an Alleged Trust — APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT, CHANCERY DIVISION. Judgment for Defendants and Plaintiff Appeals. This controversy arises from a clause in the will of C. P. Barnes, deceased, being the seventh clause of said will and is as follows: “I desire that my friend, Robert M. Jewell, be retained in the employ of the firm on such liberal terms as his long and faithful service entitle him to.” The petition shows that for many years the appellant had been a…

1Opinion of the Court

*331Opinion op the court bt

JUDÜE HOBSON

Aepirming.

Appellant-, Robert M. Jewell, filed this suit against the appellees, the Louisville Trust Company, as the administrator with the will annexed, and S. S. Barnes, the residuary devisee, of C. P. Barnes, deceased. The court below sustained a demurrer to his petition, and, he failing to plead further, dismissed the action. The only question on the appeal is, therefore, did the petition state a cause of action?

It was alleged in the petition that O. P. Barnes was at the time of his death, and had been for many years theretofore, engaged in business as a…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Conlan v. SullivanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935
  2. Williams v. Williams' CommitteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API