Legal Opinion

Williams v. Williams' Committee

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 5, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Drury, Commissioner

Reversing.

Taylor Williams and five others, claiming to be devisees under the will of W. A. Williams, were held to-have no interest in his estate, that no trust was created for their benefit, and have appealed.

Omitting the caption and certificate of probate, this is the will:

“I, W. A. Williams, being of sound mind and disposing memory, and desire to indicate while I am able to do so the disposition I wish made of my property after my death, do hereby make, publish and declare this to be my last will and testament, hereby revoking any and all other…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Colton v. ColtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. McMurry v. StanleyTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Ide v. IdeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  4. Howard v. CarusiSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Gifford v. ChoateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Byars v. ByarsTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Keiser v. JensenIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Henry v. SpurlinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  4. Ridley v. ShepardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  5. Bosworth v. KilbournCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API