Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Barile v. Murff

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided November 10, 1953No. Civ. A. No. 6954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHESNUT, District Judge.

The petitioner, an alien, is seeking a writ of habeas corpus to release him from the custody of the Commissioner of Immigration under a warrant for deportation. A rule to show cause was issued on the filing of the petition and after the respondent’s return a hearing was promptly held on the papers and arguments submitted.

The warrant for deportation is based on the authority of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, § 241(a)(4), 8 U.S.C.A. § 1251(a)(4), the McCarran Act. The relevant portion of the section reads as follows:

“(a) Any alien in the United States…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Harisiades v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Fong Yue Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Mahler v. EbySupreme Court of the United States · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. De Luca v. O'RourkeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  2. United States Ex Rel. Impastato v. O'rourke, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  3. Ex Parte Robles-RubioDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1954
  4. PBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API