Leftwich v. Court of Criminal Appeals
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
T1 Petitioner seeks from this Court an extraordinary writ of prohibition, or in the alternative an extraordinary writ of mandamus, for the purpose of controlling the discretion of the Court of Criminal Appeals in its interpretation of Article 5 § 22 of the Oklahoma Constitution in an order of that court filed June 9, 2011, in Leftwich v. Alcorn, PR-2011-819.
12 The Supreme Court heard oral argument from the Petitioner, Real Party in Interest, and Amicus Curiae. Counsel for Petitioner, counsel for the Real Party in Interest, and counsel for Amicus Curiae all agreed during oral argument…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re M.B.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
3Cited by8 opinions
- Leftwich v. AlcornCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- Leftwich v. AlcornCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- Leftwich v. AlcornCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- Leftwich v. Court of Criminal AppealsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.