Legal Opinion

Leftwich v. Court of Criminal Appeals

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 19, 2011No. 109,609PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

T1 Petitioner seeks from this Court an extraordinary writ of prohibition, or in the alternative an extraordinary writ of mandamus, for the purpose of controlling the discretion of the Court of Criminal Appeals in its interpretation of Article 5 § 22 of the Oklahoma Constitution in an order of that court filed June 9, 2011, in Leftwich v. Alcorn, PR-2011-819.

12 The Supreme Court heard oral argument from the Petitioner, Real Party in Interest, and Amicus Curiae. Counsel for Petitioner, counsel for the Real Party in Interest, and counsel for Amicus Curiae all agreed during oral argument…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re M.B.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Leftwich v. AlcornCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
  2. Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
  3. Leftwich v. AlcornCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
  4. Leftwich v. AlcornCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
  5. Leftwich v. Court of Criminal AppealsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API