Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Hall

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided May 29, 2020No. 5:19-cv-00006Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA WAYCROSS DIVISION JOHN ANDERSON, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 5:19-cv-6 v. HILTON HALL; RICKY STONE; GUY AUGUSTIN; DEANNA WILDES; AUDRA JOHNSON; and CORECIVIC, INC., Defendants. MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff filed this action, asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 1. This matter is before the Court for a frivolity screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. For the reasons stated below, I RECOMMEND the Court DISMISS Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Hill, Stone, Wildes, and CoreCivic, Inc. I…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API