North Carolina National Bank v. McCarley & Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
A 12(b)(6) motion tests the sufficiency of the complaint to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. A complaint may be dismissed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) “ ‘if clearly without any merit; and this want of merit may consist in an absence of law to support a claim of the sort made, or of facts sufficient to make a good claim, or in the disclosure of some fact which will necessarily defeat the claim.’ But a complaint should not be dismissed for insufficiency unless it appears to a certainty that plaintiff is entitled to no relief under any state of facts which could be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Southern Ohio Bank, Under the Will of Virgil A. Diperna, Deceased v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Alpar v. WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Patterson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Orange County v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Robert Wooler Co. v. Fidelity BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Thornton & Company, Inc. v. Gwinnett Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Stanley v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981