Legal Opinion

Rush v. Chattanooga Du Pont Employees' Credit Union

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1962PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

The Trial Court entered a judgment for the plaintiff in this case. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the case for further proof. We have granted certiorari.

The facts are that Mary R. Leatherwood, as principal, signed a promissory note payable to Chattanooga Du Pont Employees’ Credit Union, or order, in the amount of $448.00 “with interest on unpaid balance at the rate of one per cent per month, payable in equal installments of Five and no/100 dollars; the first payment to be made on 7-15-56 and a like amount every wk thereafter until the full amount has been paid”.

Bettie Rush and F.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brush v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Shousha v. Matthews Drivurself Service, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  3. McGannon v. FarrellTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Litterer v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Brady v. WelshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pacific Eastern Corp. v. Gulf Life Holding Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  2. Riverside Park Realty Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1978
  3. Cumberland Capital Corp. v. PattyTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. PettyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  5. Jo Ann Forman, Inc. v. National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API