Legal Opinion

New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Gray

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 16, 1957No. 86, Docket 24187PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

The trial judge denied recovery because he held that the loss incurred was not caused by any “peril of the seas.” As his findings show, the loss occurred as follows: The “sea” (i.e., water from the river) leaked into the carfloat; this caused the vessel to list and settle; this, in turn, caused some of the railroad’s cars and their cargo to slide into the river; then the vessel lurched and other cars and their cargo also fell into the river. The judge held that railroad’s employees had been guilty of “gross negligence” which was “the immediate cause and the only cause of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. The Steamboat New World v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Waters v. Merchants' Louisville InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  3. Union Insurance v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. David B. Dale v. Henry P. Rosenfeld, Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Henry P. Rosenfeld Co., Samson Wallach and Abraham S. GechtmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  5. Henjes v. Aetna Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  2. The Continental Insurance Company v. Hersent Offshore, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API