Legal Opinion

State v. Tellez

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 5, 1990No. 1 CA-CR 88-1400PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GERBER, Judge.

This case presents the issue of whether the fine provision found in A.R.S. § 13-3408 is mandatory for defendants convicted under A.R.S. § 13-1002 for solicitation to sell narcotic drugs.

FACTS

Appellant George Luis Tellez (defendant) attempted to sell cocaine to an undercover police officer and was arrested. The state charged him by indictment with conspiracy to sell narcotic drugs and with the sale of narcotic drugs, both class 2 felonies.

Defendant entered into a plea agreement agreeing to plead guilty to solicitation to sell narcotic drugs, a class 4 felony, in violation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BouchierCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  2. State v. OleaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. State v. CoryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  4. State v. GraciaArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Manuel CORONADO-DURAZO, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. State v. Van AdamsArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Peters v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  4. State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. State v. PeekArizona Supreme Court · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API