Legal Opinion

Michael Su Chia v. Steven Cambra, Jr., Warden Attorney General of the State of California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 4, 2004No. 99-56361PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

360 F.3d 997

Michael Su CHIA, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

Steven CAMBRA, Jr., Warden; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 99-56361.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted December 7, 2000 — Pasadena, California.

Filed March 4, 2004.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED James Dirks, Sacramento, California, for the petitioner-appellant.

Valerie A. Baker, Deputy Attorney General, State of California, Los Angeles, California, for the respondents-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Ronald S.W.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. (HC) Allen v. CDCRDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  2. (HC) Hill v. HattonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  3. (HC) McCulley v. AdamsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. (HC) Minchak v. CovelloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. (HC) Pryor v. SpearmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API