Legal Opinion
Lizalde v. Advanced Planning Services, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 22, 2012No. Case No. 10-CV-834-AJB (RBB)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge.
Now before the Court are several motions to dismiss this copyright infringement and breach of contract action. The Court found the motions suitable for decision on the written briefs. Local Civil R. 7.1(d). For the reasons stated below, the Court denies the motions to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”).
Background
Plaintiffs Raul Lizalde and VEBS, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) filed a SAC against three groups of Defendants. When appropriate the Court refers to them collectively as…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- OEG Inc v. KorumDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025