Legal Opinion
Matthews v. Proler
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 29, 1990No. B14-89-464-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DRAUGHN, Justice.
Seeking to recover attorney’s fees, appellant Guy E. Matthews filed this action against appellee Sam Proler for breach of contract, recovery in quantum meruit, and suit on a sworn account. Pursuant to Tex. R.Civ.P. 120a, Proler made a special appearance through counsel asserting lack of in personam jurisdiction. The trial court sustained Proler’s motion and dismissed the suit for want of jurisdiction. Thereafter, Matthews requested that the trial court state in writing its findings of fact and conclusions of law, pursuant to Tex.R. Civ.P. 296 and 297. Following the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kawasaki Steel Corp. v. MiddletonTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Zac Smith & Co. v. Otis Elevator Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
- Middleton v. Kawasaki Steel Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Moni Pulo Ltd. v. Trutec Oil and Gas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- Juarez v. United Parcel Service De Mexico S.A. De C.V., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
- Moni Pulo Limited v. Trutec Oil and Gas, Inc. D/B/A Martindale Associates Limited, Trutec Investment Services Company Limited, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- Shally Avshalomov, Individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Josua Avshalomov v. Property Improvements, Inc. and Avishai Ron, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
- Walmart, Inc. v. Fintiv, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2021