Legal Opinion
Lincoln Printing Co. v. Middle West Utilities Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 26, 1934No. 11654PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
On January 10, 1984, this court announced that for reasons then stated a hearing should be had promptly to determine whether the appointment of receivers for Middle West Utilities Company, hereinafter termed Middle West, was the result of collusion and fraud upon the court.
Middle West was one of the group of so-called Insull corporations which included among others two investment trusts, Insull Utility Investments, Inc., and Corporation Securities Company.
On April 16, 1932, Calvin Fentress was appointed receiver for Insull Utility Investments, Inc., and, later,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Harkin v. BrundageSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Re Metropolitan Railway ReceivershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Quincy, Missouri & Pacific Railroad v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Fox Theatres CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Fleet National Bank v. H & D Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
- In Re Middle West Utilities Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1936
- Lincoln Printing Co. v. Middle West Utilities Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
- In re Marine Harbor Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942