Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Marine Harbor Properties, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 10, 1942No. 107Published

1DissentFrank, Circuit Judge

My colleagues base their decision, requiring dismissal of the petition, on Section 146(4) as they consider it to have been interpreted in the earlier decision of this court in Brooklyn Trust Co. v. Rembaugh, 2 Cir., 110 F.2d 838. That decision has been severely criticized. See 18 N.Y.U.L. Q.Rev. (1941) 399, 418; cf. 412-443.

I am wholly in accord with the general policy of adherence to rulings in earlier decisions. But there are well recognized exceptions to that policy, and I think that the instant case comes squarely within those exceptions. Undeniably, in order to achieve impartial…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API