Legal Opinion
Williams v. United States
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided June 10, 2004No. CIV.A. H-02-4075Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WERLEIN, District Judge.
Pending is Defendant/Cross-Claimant the United States of America’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 46). After carefully considering the motion, response, reply and the applicable law, the Court concludes that the United States’s motion should be granted.
I. Background
This is a tax liability case previously described in the Court’s Memorandum and Order entered May 14, 2003 (Document No. 34). The United States (“Government”) moves for summary judgment on its amended cross-claim against Dana L. Monford, as Temporary Administrator of the Estate…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Fed. Carr. Cas. P 84,067 Tex Morris Cindy Sagrera Morris v. Covan World Wide Moving, Incorporated Coleman American Moving Services, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.