Legal Opinion

State v. Sanchez

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 20, 1996No. 01-96-00012-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHEN, Justice.

Appellee was charged with felony1 driving while intoxicated2 (DWI), allegedly committed on August 11, 1995. The trial judge granted appellee’s motion to quash the indictment because it did not allege a culpable mental state. Pursuant to Tex.Code Crim. Proo. Ann. art. 44.01(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. *3721996), the State appeals. We reverse and remand.

The State contends that the requirement of a culpable mental state does not apply to the offense of DWI. We agree.

In Chunn v. State, 923 S.W.2d 728 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.], 1996, pet. filed), the judge refused to quash a DWI…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Reed v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1996
  4. Chunn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Purchase v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  2. Sanders v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  3. Kevin Lyle Sanders v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
  4. Paul Allgyer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  5. Purchase, Samuel Reben v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API