Legal Opinion

Sanders v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided March 26, 1997No. 03-96-00055-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIDD, Justice.

Kevin Lyle Sanders, appellant, was charged with his second offense of driving while intoxicated (“DWI”). Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 49.04 (West 1994) (since amended). After the trial court denied appellant’s motion to quash the information or complaint, the jury found appellant guilty and assessed his punishment. In two points of error, appellant challenges the conviction. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to quash because the complaint did not allege a culpable mental state and was therefore fatally defective. We will affirm the trial court’s judgment.

PROC…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Reed v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1996
  3. Chunn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
  4. Aguirre v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  5. State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hyde v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  2. Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Cesilee Hyde v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  4. James Trotter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  5. Jeffrey Lon Sumner v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API