Legal Opinion
Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. Robert Naftaly, Township of L'Anse
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 26, 2006No. 05-1952PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClay, J., joined by Daughtrey, J.,
GUY, J. (p. 533 - 534), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Naftaly, et al., appeal the June 1, 2005 order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan granting Plaintiff Keweenaw Bay Indian Community’s motion for summary judgment, entering the declaratory judgment that the Michigan General Property ’Fax Act (“Act”), Mich. Comp. Laws § 211.1 et seq., was not valid as applied to real property held in fee simple by Plaintiff or its members within the exterior boundaries of the L’Anse Indian Reservation, and enjoining…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. GenschowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- In Re Milestone Scientific Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. RisingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Muriel Harris v. TD Ameritrade, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma v. LoganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.