Muriel Harris v. TD Ameritrade, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
Elsie, Muriel, and David Harris (mother, father, son) do not like how their broker is holding stock on their behalf. They claim they have a right to another form of stock ownership and filed a lawsuit to that effect. Yet no right of action — at least not one they have filed — permits them to vindicate the right here. Right or wrong about the underlying form of ownership, they cannot vindicate that position in the absence of a cause of action authorizing the lawsuit. Because neither federal securities law nor Nebraska commercial law gives the Har-rises a private…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Scottsdale Insurance v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Jones v. CarusoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dennis Shipman v. Wells Fargo Advisors and Chubb Ltd.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2026
- Harris v. TD Ameritrade Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Harris v. TD Ameritrade Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Jarred Farnham v. Campari America, LLC, et al.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2025
- Valelly v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith IncorporatedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020