Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Greene County v. Gideon

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 22, 1917PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Greene Circuit Court. — Hon. Arch A. Johnson, Judge. (1) Relator and respondents agree that the history of the passage of the Act of 1915 shows that it was the intention of the Legislature to enact the second provision found in that hill. Ex parte Helton, 117 Mo. App. 609. (2) It was obviously the intention of the Legislature in 1915 to provide for the payment to the State and county a part of the money derived from dramshop licenses.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Greene Circuit Court. — Hon. Arch A. Johnson, Judge. (1) Relator and respondents agree that the history of the passage of the Act of 1915 shows that it was the intention of the Legislature to enact the second provision found in that hill. Ex parte Helton, 117 Mo. App. 609. (2) It was obviously the intention of the Legislature in 1915 to provide for the payment to the State and county a part of the money derived from dramshop licenses. That intent should be made effective. State ex rel. v. McQuillin, 246 Mo. 534; State ex rel. v. Rippee, 177 Mo. App. 245; State ex inf. v. Railroad,…

1Opinion of the CourtWoodson, J.

This is a mandamus proceeding instituted in the circuit court of Greene County, by the appellant, to compel respondents to allow, audit and pay a claim made by the county to a portion of the dramshop license levied and collected by the City of Springfield.

The trial court decided the case against the county, and in due time and in proper form it appeáled the cause to this court.

The facts of the case are these: The city of Springfield is a city of the second class, located in Greene County, and is operating under a commission form of government which was enacted in 1913 (Laws 1913, p. 420), and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Erickson v. BurrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  2. People v. DobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Omaha Real Estate & Trust Co. v. KragscowNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Quick v. White-Water TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Ex Parte HewlettNevada Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. Carolene ProductsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  2. State Ex Rel. Smith v. AtterburySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. Griffith v. GardnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. Jacoby v. Missouri Valley Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  5. Lodge 1858, American Federation of Government Employees v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API