People v. Baker
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Eaton; Smith, J. Charles Baker was convicted of burglary.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The respondent has been tried for and convicted of the offense of burglary. Mr. Maynard opened the case to the jury for the people, stating “that, among other things, he expected to show that the respondent, his brother, Adam Baker, and his nephew, John Smith, *212broke into Charles Tanner’s barn, which was within the curtilage, on the night of the 8th of June, 1895, and stole Charles Tanner’s wool, and that the wool was carried out to the road, and loaded into a buggy, and the buggy was tracked to the house of the respondent; that Charles Tanner procured a warrant to be issued in this case for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. ReshMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. McCulloughMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Farrand v. AldrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Hill v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- People v. ConsidineMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. DellabondaMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- People v. HarrisonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. FulwiderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. WaltonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. HendersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.