Legal Opinion

Stacey v. IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 2000No. 25288PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Justice.

This is an appeal from the district court’s determination that Idaho law does not provide for an interlocutory appeal from a Personnel Commission Hearing Officer’s decisions. We affirm.

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

In January 1995, Virginia Stacey’s position as Chief of the Idaho Department of Labor’s Human Resources Bureau was abolished. Stacey filed a departmental grievance and then a grievance appeal to the Idaho Personnel Commission, which was assigned to a hearing officer. During the discovery process, the Department objected to several of Stacey’s discovery requests…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rincover v. State, Department of FinanceIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Lockhart v. Department of Fish and GameIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Swisher v. State Department of Environmental & Community ServicesIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Pounds v. DenisonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Stroud v. Department of Labor & Industrial ServicesIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Osburn v. RandelIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Reardon v. Magic Valley Sand and GravelIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. American Family Life Insurance Company v. Estate of Robert W BradleyDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API