Gavahan v. Village of Shorewood
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
The trial judge was of opinion that upon the evidence the plaintiff was entitled to recover $800, but considered that the action was in equity, and that the court was without power to grant him relief because the action as brought was one at law. In this he was wrong in two respects. The action is one commonly denominated for money had and received, which is an action at law. Steuerwald v. Richter, 158 Wis. 597, 149 N. W. 692; 41 Corp. Jur. p. 28. And if it were in equity the court should have dismissed the jury of his own motion and proceeded with the case or proceeded with it without…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moffett, Hodgkins & Clarke Co. v. RochesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Steuerwald v. RichterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- McIntyre v. CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- State ex rel. Sheldon v. DahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Robinson v. Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rushlight Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Village Food & Liquor Mart v. H & S Petroleum, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Trempealeau County v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Nelson Inc. v. Sewerage Comm. of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Oosterwyk v. BucholtzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.