Legal Opinion

Hyundai Motor Finance Co. v. McKay (In re McKay)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided December 15, 2010No. Bankruptcy No. 4:08-bk-16664 E; Adversary No. 4:09-ap-01092PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT

AUDREY R. EVANS, Bankruptcy Judge.

On October 19, 2010, the Court heard the Plaintiffs Motion to Enforce Settlement (“Motion to Enforce”). The Debtor appeared pro se, and Charles (“Charlie”) Coleman appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff, Hyundai Motor Finance Company (“Hyundai”). Robert L. Skip Henry appeared on behalf of James (“Jim”) Smith, Jr., who was also present. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(a) and 1334. This is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Hyundai filed its…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. McCoy Farms, Inc. v. J & M McKEESupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. In Re Telesphere Communications, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
  3. Alltel Corp. v. SumnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Ward v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Billingham v. Wynn & Wynn, P.C. (In Re Rothwell)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In RE McKAYUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2010
  2. Hebl v. Windeshausen (In re Windeshausen)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API