Legal Opinion
Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided March 20, 1944No. 4-7357PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The parties to this litigation are the State Highway Commission, which was created by § 647-8, Pope’s Digest, and which is vested with all the powers and duties necessary,, or proper, to enable it to carry out and execute the laws of the state relating to the'state highways; and appellee, a corporation author-, ized to conduct a telephone business in this state, and clothed with'the privileges conferred by § 4991, Pope’s Digest.
The decree from which is this appeal was rendered upon the pleadings, which disclosed the following facts. The Highway -Commission has the control and management of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Georgia v. Trustees of the Cincinnati Southern RailwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Ahrent v. SpragueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Batesville & Winerva Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. BiddleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. Southern California Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Bettencourt v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- United States v. Mrs. Vesta M. Pinson and J.H. PinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- International Paper Co. v. MCI Worldcom Network Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2002
- Safeway Trails, Inc. v. FurmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.