Legal Opinion

Motykie v. Motykie

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 28, 2024No. 1:23-cv-01779Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION KEVIN D. MOTYKIE, et al., Plaintiffs No. 23 CV 1779 v. Judge Jeremy C. Daniel GARY MOTYKIE, M.D., et al., Defendants ORDER For the reasons stated in this order, the defendants’ motions to dismiss [56, 58, 62] are granted. The Rooker-Feldman doctrine bars this Court from exercising subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiffs’ federal claims. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiffs’ state law claims. The defendants’ motion for leave to file supplemental authority [71] is…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Dennis v. SparksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits Trust v. Walgreen Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Apex Digital, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Lewis Borsellino and I.M. Acquisitions, LLC v. Goldman Sachs Group, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  5. Bankers Trust Company, Cross-Appellee v. Old Republic Insurance Company, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API