Legal Opinion
Amaya v. Santistevan
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided May 1, 1992No. 13059PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Judge.
This court’s opinion, filed March 24, 1992, is withdrawn on the court’s own motion and the following opinion is substituted in its place.
Amaya appeals from the district court’s decision discharging the writ of garnishment she had served upon Rio Grande Credit Union (RGCU). We conclude that the district court erred in entering judgment for RGCU, and we reverse and remand.
BACKGROUND.
In January 1990, Amaya secured a compensation order in her workers’ compensation claim against her employer, Leonard Santistevan. When he failed to pay, she applied for a supplementary…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gillman v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Heffernan v. Wollaston Credit UnionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Transamerica Insurance v. SydowNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- Jemko, Inc. v. LiaghatNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- Retha D. Frierson v. United Farm Agency, Inc., the Merchants Bank, Intervenor Below. Retha D. Frierson v. United Farm Agency, Inc., the Merchants BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chavez v. Mercury Finance (In Re Chavez)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2001
- Gallegos v. EspinozaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- Meiboom v. WatsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998