Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hicks

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1994No. 93-SC-048-DGPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMBERT, Justice.

This Court granted the Commonwealth’s motion for discretionary review of an opinion of the Court of Appeals which directed the trial court to grant appellee’s petition for writ of prohibition. The Court of Appeals determined that dismissal of the underlying DUI and reckless driving charges was with prejudice by virtue of CR 41.02(3).

In April of 1991, appellee was charged with third offense DUI and reckless driving. Following arraignment in the Kenton District Court, trial was set for August 1, 1991. On the day set for trial, on motion of the Commonwealth and without objection…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Polk v. WimsattCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1985
  3. Crawley v. KunzmanKentucky Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Allen v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1991

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. AllenKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. WirthKentucky Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Keeling v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Commonwealth v. TaberKentucky Supreme Court · 1997

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API