City of San Diego v. Higgins
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. E. S. Torrance, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Appeal from the judgment entered after demurrer sustained, plaintiff having declined to amend.
The action was for the recovery of four hundred and eighty-three dollars and forty-six cents, being the amount of municipal taxes levied by the plaintiff upon the property of defendant Higgins, for the year 1887, *172with interest at the rate of two per cent a month, from January 1, 1888. A personal judgment against the defendant Higgins is asked, and it is also sought to subject the property to the lien of the taxes, principal, interest, penalties, and costs. The complaint was filed December 12, 1894.
Of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. BallerinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- State v. Yellow Jacket Silver Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1879
- City & County of San Francisco v. LuningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- People v. HulbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Lewis v. RothchildCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by21 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Chambers v. GallagherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Dranga v. RoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Lemhi County Ex Rel. Gilbreath v. Boise Livestock Loan Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Woods v. HydeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.