Legal Opinion

Condon v. Daland Nissan, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 4, 2016No. A145613PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BANKE, J.

Plaintiff Gene Condon prevailed in an arbitration against defendants Daland Nissan, Inc., Federated Mutual Insurance Company, and Wells Fargo Dealer Services. Facing a total award in excess of $100,000, defendants sought a new arbitration in accordance with the terms of the arbitration provision in the parties’ contract. Because Condon objected, the arbitral forum would not proceed with a new arbitration without a court order. The trial court refused to order a new arbitration and, instead, confirmed the award. In the court’s view, because the arbitral forum lacked separate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co.California Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Toal v. TardifCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Bunker Hill Park Ltd. v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. ECC Capital Corp. v. Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API