Legal Opinion
Fautenberry v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 10, 2009No. 09-3819Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
572 F.3d 267 (2009)
John FAUTENBERRY, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Betty MITCHELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 09-3819.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Submitted: July 7, 2009.
Decided and Filed: July 10, 2009.
ON BRIEF: Dennis Lyle Sipe, Buell and Sipe Co., L.P.A., Marietta, Ohio, Tyson Fleming, Randall L. Porter, Office of the Ohio Public Defender, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant. Justin M. Lovett, Office of the Ohio Attorney General, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee.
Before: BATCHELDER, MOORE, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.
2Opinion of the Court · BatchelderBatchelder, J., joined by Gilman, J.,
MOORE, J. (pp. 271-72), delivered a separate opinion concurring in…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Harbison v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Ohio Adult Parole Authority v. WoodardSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Fautenberry v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Philip Workman v. Governor Phil BredesenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Getsy v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.