Legal Opinion

Spence v. Jones

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1986No. 8612DC210PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

In defendant’s first Assignment of Error she contends that the court erred in denying defendant’s motion for a continuance. We do not agree.

Rule 40(b), N. C. Rules Civ. P., states, in pertinent part, “A continuance may be granted only for good cause shown and upon such terms and conditions as justice may require.” “The motion must state the grounds therefor and must show good cause for the requested continuance.” W. Shuford, N.C. Civil Practice and Procedure sec. 40-4 (2d ed. 1981). Continuances are addressed to the sound discretion of trial judges. Shankle v. Shankle, 289 N.C.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wade v. WadeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Shankle v. ShankleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Currence v. HardinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Weaver v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Little v. LittleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Caswell Realty Associates I, L.P. v. Andrews Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Pickard Roofing Co., Inc. v. BarbourCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Alexander v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Lawrence v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API