Legal Opinion
Weaver v. Weaver
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided February 5, 1985No. 8410DC99PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
HH
The defendant first contends that the trial court failed to calculate correctly the present value of defendant’s interest in his accounting partnership.
A spouse’s interest in a professional partnership is a marital asset subject to equitable distribution. See Stern v. Stern, 66 N.J. 340, 331 A. 2d 257 (1975); In re Marriage of Fonstein, 17 Cal. 3d 738, 131 Cal. Rptr. 873, 552 P. 2d 1169 (1976). Placing a precise or even approximately accurate value on such a partnership interest, especially when the partner whose interest is in question continues as a member of the firm, is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stern v. SternSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- In Re Marriage of FonsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- In Re the Marriage of FleegeWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re Marriage of NicholsColorado Court of Appeals · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Harmon v. HarmonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Armstrong v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Poore v. PooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- McLean v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.