Mudd v. Nosker Lumber, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge:
In this opinion, we are called upon to determine whether the presumption of prejudice which arises from a delay in the prosecution of a civil complaint in excess of two years may be rebutted by the conduct of the defendant seeking a judgment of non pros. We hold that where the circumstances indicate that the party seeking non pros has come to the court of equity with unclean hands, that party is estopped from obtaining this equitable remedy. Accordingly, we hold that the trial court erred as a matter of law in granting appellee’s motion for a judgment non pros, and therefore…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sprague v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Penn Piping, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- In Re Estate of PedrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Tallarico EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Pennridge Electric, Inc. v. Souderton Area Joint School AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Jacobs v. HalloranSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Somerset Community Hospital v. Allan B. Mitchell & Associates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Bro-Tech Corp. v. Thermax, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- In Re Estate of ScharlachSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- In Re Estate of AielloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.